Feature Requests For CIS

I propose to introduce a more understandable system for diagnosing and displaying problems with CIS in a simple, understandable presentation, so that the user can independently find out what the problem is. If a failure occurred, then where, why, and all this was in an understandable form. At the moment, if there are any problems with CIS, then it is not possible to find out what the reason is: its dumps, logs, etc. a simple user is not able to read it, due to incompetence in this area and the complexity of this same output data, and support from Comodo is dead, there is none. They don’t help on the forum, but send me to write about the problem in Xcitium, and in Xcitium they send me to write about the problem to some email address that no one reads. Comodo has about 5 email addresses supposedly where you can get help, but they are all dead. Where should i write? Therefore, the logical action would be to do as I suggest above - to give users the opportunity to understand the problem themselves and, if possible, solve it.

In version 12.2 the Comodo firewall allows to adjust the number of alert pop-ups using the option "Set alert frequency level": this ranges from 'Low' to 'Very High'. This directly influences the way rules are being created or extended when a specific alert is blocked or allowed. However, the level of detail can only be adjusted in a fixed sequence, which is: Outgoing/Incoming -> TCP/UDP -> Port-wise -> IP-adress-wise. Therefore, if I want rules to be created specific for the IP-address, I will get rules only for the specific port of that alert (and either for TCP or UDP and Outgoing/Incoming). However, I often do want rules specific for the IP-address but not specific for the port. Therefore, after a rule is created when I answered to an alert, I have to manually open the firewall options, find the specific rule and adjust its setting for source/target port. This is quite annoying. I can think of the following two enhancements that would improve this: (1) The setting "Set alert frequency level" is extended by an option "Individually". If "Individually" is chosen, then the different rule criteria can be activated separately (i.e. Outgoing/Incoming, TCP/UDP, Port, IP-adress). (2) Offering on each single alert the option to create the rule specific to these criteria (i.e. ignoring the option "Set alert frequency level" for this specific alert). This would allow that for a specific program the rule creation could be made more or less detailed. It would probably be a good idea to have a setting that would activate/deactivate this option. I think both suggestions would be an improvement on their own, but having both would be even better.

Just install Wireguard, all app can bypass CIS firewall. when CIS support it ?

so if i want to block a program from accessing the internet, i select it from the rules as "blocked application", but the only way to allow it again at the moment is to go on a clicking/ticking marathon, so please fix it by: 1) add a button next to the rule, which you can click on/off, 2) which should also change the color of the button to green/red - the same style button that some browser cookie settings are showing you after you switch those on/off

at the moment the "clear log" will probably erase all of the logs for every feature like firewall, antivirus, threats etc, but can you add a separate log clearing option for the firewall at least? because firewall creates most of the events in the log file if i block some app, so it would be nice if i could clear these separately from everything else...

Comodo Online Security Pro extension should be an effective defense against phishing and viruses.

Added the ability to integrate the free version of Comodo with the Itarian console

Leaked passwords, emails, accounts, credit card details.

ThinkPad X13s have ARM CPU and i cannot use CIS on it. ARM CPU is true future of laptop pc. you should consider to support it.

like the old cis realtime network monitor both in program and in the widget thanks